Text Editors (34)

1 Name: Nameless : 2026/01/21 09:08

What text editor do you use and why?

2 Name: Nameless : 2026/01/22 20:44

Notepad, it's the punishment my soul deserves.

3 Name: Nameless : 2026/01/23 15:08

What about when you're not using Windows? Then what editor do you use?

4 Name: Nameless : 2026/01/26 16:11

Sublime text

5 Name: Nameless : 2026/01/27 17:48

>>3
XEmacs

6 Name: Nameless : 2026/01/28 09:15

>>5
I was kind of surprised they cut a new release in 2025. I compiled it for shits and giggles a few months ago, and I was surprised to find out:
- It didn't have `M-x ielm`.
- It didn't have `M-x load-theme`.
- It didn't have tab functions bound under `C-x t`.
- It didn't have org-mode built in.
- It did have `M-x calc` though.

It's probably missing a ton more, but that was what I initially encountered. Emacs from that era was very primitive compared to what exists today in 2026.
https://www.xemacs.org/

7 Name: Nameless : 2026/02/03 20:54

>>6
I have become so used to its primitive nature.

8 Name: Nameless : 2026/02/04 05:52

I used to be big on Notepad++ and jEdit
nowadays, I don't care that much, although they're both still useful editors

I probably should have become an emacs guy after bouncing off off vim, but I didn't feel like learning it either.

9 Name: Nameless : 2026/02/05 13:55

>>6
the website still has a section for the y2k bug. how quaint

10 Name: Nameless : 2026/02/09 05:12

>>8
I've heard that notepad++ has spyware built into it, but I've done absolutely no research into this.

11 Name: Nameless : 2026/02/09 12:10

>>10
there was a recent attack that targeted the download server to sneak in evil spyware binaries for specifically targeted users
insufficient checking in the auto updater meant that the evil update was accepted instead of being identified as being from a third party and rejected

https://notepad-plus-plus.org/news/clarification-security-incident/

12 Name: Nameless : 2026/02/09 13:50

I guess it's good that I haven't used it in a while then.

13 Name: Nameless : 2026/02/10 07:15

Shit ( ´,_ゝ｀)

14 Name: Nameless : 2026/02/12 01:59

Vim because I can count on it being installed on a linux or at least vi and because I can use it without graphics over ssh or serial etc and because it's powerful
but honestly I don't use it very well

15 Name: Nameless : 2026/02/12 06:17

it has been a while since I've seen a system without nano
and for those that don't have it, they're typically missing so much shit I'd use that I would ideally not actually do any text editing on the system itself and would probably just be copying files to/from it

16 Name: Nameless : 2026/02/13 15:23

on windows -> npp
on linux -> vim or kate

17 Name: Nameless : 2026/02/19 21:16

Featherpad for simple things, neovim for everything else.

18 Name: Nameless : 2026/04/18 01:21

I'm testing to see if I can post from Emacs using `M-x eww`.

19 Name: Nameless : 2026/04/20 03:32

Neovim. Nothing better than it.

20 Name: j : 2026/04/24 04:39

sam or acme, or ms-notepad when i must

21 Name: Nameless : 2026/04/28 01:36

sakura when dealing with Japanese scripts

22 Name: Nameless : 2026/05/07 08:07

Vis. Best of both worlds (vim and sam).

23 Name: Nameless : 2026/05/09 09:45

>>22
obscure but cool.
i watched a few demo videos, and editing with the structural commands was impressive.
it's also similar enough to vi that and experienced vi/vim user could use it in a basic way.
https://www.brain-dump.org/projects/vis/

24 Name: Nameless : 2026/05/12 01:10

Notepad.

25 Name: Nameless : 2026/05/12 17:31

>>24
You too have to punish your soul like >>2?

26 Name: Nameless : 2026/05/16 16:02

micro

27 Name: Nameless : 2026/05/30 08:36

For programming GNU Emacs. For simple text files, config files, and small scripts I use mg. mg is great for what it is, it has Emacs keybinds (important), and has no distractions that would be annoying otherwise.

Neatvi is interesting in terms of what it is capable of while being a more featureful vi rather than a less capable vim. However, as much as it would be a good alternative to mg, I cannot cope with a text editor without Emacs keybinds, so unfortunately it's not an option, even though it is really cool.

28 Name: Nameless : 2026/05/31 18:11

>>27
Mg is my goto editor for when nothing else is available as a package, but honestly the way it mimics GNU Emacs over its MicroEMACS siblings always trips me up.C-h backspace, C-z scroll-up and Esc to end a minibuffer command, of which my GNU .emacs restores the first two. The lengthy confirmation dialog on exit is also disorienting and far more annoying in mg.

29 Name: Nameless : 2026/06/01 08:09

Emacs is the editor for true otaku.

30 Name: Nameless : 2026/06/16 00:05

Nano rocks. When I'm writing a program in C++ I have two terminal windows open on the left/right side of my screen. On one I have nano open and the other I use to run cmake/make. Honestly the best dev setup I've come up with since I started programming

31 Name: Nameless : 2026/06/18 04:29

I am the bone of my SICP.
Scheme is my body, and Lisp is my blood.
I have typed over 1024 parentheses.
Unknown to Java.
Nor known to C#.
Have withstood emacs to write many programs.
Yet these skills will never lead to a career.
So as I pray, Unlimited Satori Works!

32 Name: Nameless : 2026/06/18 19:39

>>31
You type like 10 parenthesis per line when programming Lisp, so you've written like 102 lines of code? I get the joke, but still it doesn't add up.

Return Read All Last 50 posts
Name: E-Mail:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: